Climate reparations take center stage at COP27 l ABCNL



Inger Anderson, Director of the UN Climate Program, looks at how the world is responding to the climate crisis and calls for payments to countries most affected by the effects of global warming. WATCH the live stream of ABC News here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_Ma8oQLmSM SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://bit.ly/2vZb6yP Watch more at http://abcnews.go. com/ LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/abcnews FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/abc #ABCNLUpdate #climate #ClimateChange #COP27 #environment #UnitedNations #reparations

Original source (ABC/Youtube)

34 comments

  1. It’s bad enough that these fear mongers are trying to scare people with greatly exaggerated data and fictitious forecasts about climate change, as only the ignorant will truly feel the fear, but I would love to know on what basis these claims are made. These people are pathological liars and they refuse to debate the topic based on science because they either do not know the science or they make it up because they know that those who believe are uneducated fools who will capitulate by giving away all of our rights to an s as already overbearing government that has more power than they are supposed to have. By the way, warming does not create droughts because warmer air increases humidity due to a higher rate of evaporation, but I guess when facts get in the way of a scam, then it will labeled disinformation by these crooks and thieves that will burn in the lake of fire and brimstone when their judgment day arrives.

  2. All life is carbon. Zero carbon = zero life. So the fact they can't reach zero carbon is a scam to find an excuse to continue their criminal business model.

  3. BEWARE that 'Reparations' are a BUSINESS MODEL designed to virtually enslave all for generations to come, to pay off fake debt and fake interest.
    They did it with the Transatlantic Slave Trade, and all colours and ethnicities paid for it in 'taxes', including in various colonies.
    Same trick, different pony.
    There is another side to slavery, and that was willing slavery in return for housing and keep. Reportedly, Elizabeth I disliked slavery and told Francis Drake to not take any, then added 'unless they ask to be'. However, his ilk were also thieving children 4 years old up from Ireland, Bristol and along the SW Coast of England as well as coastal France. Cotton picking height. Free – whereas they had to pay the Arab and Black tribal leaders on the African coast (they weren't allowed into the interior for centuries as the middle men wanted to keep the first trade to themselves).
    Circa 95% of black slaves were sold in the islands and in South America, and those who escaped formed their own new tribes. That is why today there are people in what is now the USA who think Blacks have always been in South America. They haven't been made aware of the true history.
    There were 6x more white slaves to N America than Black slaves. For hundreds of years prior to indenture, they were mostly stolen little children sold so much more cheaply they were considered disposable, so far more starved, unclothed, beaten, abused in every way and worked to death. This is another difference of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Other slave trades relied more on the slaves being adults who had often not been so cheaply bought, so were often (not always) better looked after as the owners couldn't afford to keep replacing them so often.
    There were a lot of Black and Native slave owners too. The Native Americans were found to already have slaves from tribal wars, when Europeans first settled there.
    Then there was indentured slavery, much later. The slave owner supposedly having to give a parcel of land and money to the indentured slave at the end of 7 years. It is a safe bet that a lot (not all) of indentured slaves met with 'accidents', and false allegations of serious crimes which resulted in execution rather than the owner giving land and money.

    As owners begun to breed their own slaves, the bottom went out of the market so the traders had their relatives in the British misgovernment abolish the trade and award reparations to the owners for loss of slaves. Of course the numbers of slaves were exaggerated in the claims. They also had their relatives in misgovernment borrow the money from their other relatives banks, at interest and get this insult – to rub salt in the wound they even had the audacity to run a headline in 2015 in their MSM here "Congratulations Britain. You have paid off the interest for the loan of reparations for the abolition of the slave trade". I remember seeing the headline. It wasn't that long ago. How gloating and sick is that?
    So now when you see BLM or the climate mob demanding reparations you know it is to extract more interest on their fake loans in their faux money system, and use its repayment and interest to further enslave the masses of all races and colours for generations to come.

    William Wilberforce is lauded as being a hero of abolition. In fact he owned at least one slave, and had only jumped on the bandwagon because he saw it as a popularist movement which would attract votes for him. A true political hero of the same time, William Cobbet, wrote a scathing letter to Wilberforce castigating him for not speaking up to end what was in reality white slavery in Britain. To know about that, look up about workhouses the last of which closed as late as the 1930's, as well as work and poverty in the UK through the centuries, and medieval British tortures. Who brought all that to such a cruel extent? My Belgae descent Hampshire (England) settled paternal grandmother had a lot of word of mouth family and other history, because somehow – maybe due to being rural people – her lineage weren't separated from their Elders and the history was repeated down the generations. The Romans weren't so bad and were far preferable to the far too powerful and cruel druids in the South of England. It was different for the more viking descent inhabitants of the Midlands and the North as the tribes there somehow wanted to keep their insane druid rule, so they received the brunt of Roman violence at least at first.
    By the history given to my paternal grandmother, the y syyc sons were the most savage of the invaders. Y syyc sons, their angels and ju tes then their later northman cousins with whom they interbred. The same families misrule today. Think about that. People who look similar to us but whose mindset is totally different, blaming us for their misdeeds and getting whites a bad name. No other ethnicity seems to have done that to their victims – since only clearly we whites were and are also their victims. When the truth comes out enough, will we get reparations? Will we get our homeland back as colonies have done? Of course not. They will always deny their misdeeds and where they can make bonfires of records they cannot change.
    Remember also that when that 'distinct ethnicity' were expelled from England it was over money, not the many reports of stolen little children literally sacrificed for their covertly sinister dark occult (see the star of ramphan!). They weren't put to death, they were even allowed to stay if they 'took on Christianity' (at that time RC but later Anglican, Methodist or whatever). Reportedly they aren't allowed to enslave each other nor to kill each other, so their king here simply expelled those who didn't appear to convert and later misrulers here only introduced restrictions on the trades they could carry out (when they were openly allowed back here).

    For a bit more of an overview of the black slave trade "We thought they were white" by Dontell Jackson (not the sportsman). Some have tried to debunk it by saying it was written by a white man. What they can't debunk is the information was taken from the records of the slave traders very own records and records in state archives in the USA.
    Also "who brought the slaves to America" jahtruth. You may need to use a less censored search engine. It seems they indeed were not white – not by their own reckoning. If you call them white they are likely to pertly tell you "We are NOT white. We are our own distinct ethnicity"…… Albeit their own Shlomo Sand holds that they are European and not Semite in blood lineage. What was once, millenia ago, a religion of conversion was turned into an 'ethnicity' only by birth via the maternal line. Inbreeding has created Tays Sachs and other horrendous diseases. So in my opinion those not admixed are clearly white but are now and have long been different to normal whites, by their own design.
    The above named references by Dontell Jackson and jahtruth may not be written by academics but that matters not when the facts are gleaned from the very own records of the Transatlantic Slave Traders.

    I do not blame them for running a slave trade as was usual and accepted worldwide by most if not all peoples worldwide at the time. I blame them for a lot of how they went about it, the real reasons for its abolition and for then using their influence in places of power including the media and miseducation, to engender their divide and conquer technique by scapegoating whites to cause enmity amongst non whites, and to detract attention from themselves.
    Remember they did the same throughout Europe and elsewhere. Who ran the colonies? Who were the people of power in those countries? Was it your average actual white men? Or doppelgangers?

    Arabs particularly in Saudi Arabia use slaves of all colours today. They don't pretend it's others doing it. They have always done it. No one protests against them though.
    The founder of the House of Saud converted to Islam for trading purposes, btw. Reportedly, the leaders of Iran are not really moslem.

  4. "Global Climate Crisis" is global redistribution of western wealth, aka communism, folks. Stop sipping the kool-aid. Think for yourself. Ask questions. Question my claim. If I'm wrong I'll be the first to admit it. But this is starting to wreak of rich folks clutching their pearls and keeping the peasants in their place. I'm not buying it.

    Edit: what I meant by pearl clutching rich folks…. think about the class divides that existed before tech/internet. More people are accessing wealth, information, and networking opportunities. The gatekeepers of old, who own the media networks…. is there a reason we are being told to focus on trivial nonsense bullsh*t all the time? I get the feeling it's all smoke and mirrors. If it's emotional, I tune out. Meanwhile the Trojan horse of climate change is de facto truth and cannot be questioned. GTFO. If they can impoverish the middle classes and keep us focused on our next paycheck or keeping the lights on, we don't ask questions. North Korea deliberately does this to it's citizens. It's a communist trademark. I believe the shotcallers may even be well intentioned, trying to uplift the dirt poor. But severely out of touch with the common man. I AIN'T BUYING IT.

  5. China has produced more co2 in the last 8 years than Britain has since the industrial revolution. The chinese must be laughing at us.

  6. How about the remove China from "developing nation" status first? It's stunning how China is a leading economy, pollutes like mad, and continues to be designated (and reaps benefits of) a developing nation like Honduras or something.

  7. WHISTLE BLOWER

    Meanwhile the world has IGNORED OUR OIL ALTERNATIVE since we received USA NEWS for DOUBLING the FUEL MILEAGE on a Florida Hollywood POLICE CAR with water and alcohol in 1979.

    My promoter brother died a suspicious death after we WON the BEST ECOLOGICAL PATENT PRIZE by the International Inventors Foundation in California in 1991,even against the ELECTRIC CARS. Judges concluded that we were more SUSTAINABLE because the majority of the world has USED CARS and TRUCKS and poor Countries can not afford to buy any NEW CARS $35,000 to $85,000 verses our kit @ $500.

    Even though we were recommended by the UN TRADE & DEVELOPMENT – NEW COMMODITIES REPORT since 1994, no Country implemented AQUAHOL due to OIL POWER PROPAGANDA claiming that AQUAHOL causes corrosion in engines. In REALITY RAINY DAYS causes more water to enter engines.

    See WHY on YOUTUBE titled Tectane custom 2

  8. Rockefeller, JP Morgan and the rest of the robber barons created pollution, they should pay every penny.

  9. What bullshite the UN lies more then CNN and MSNBC and Pedo Joe combined! There is no manmade climate change, Only evil people panicking the Sheeple!

  10. Right In Two – Tool * you can find the song with lyrics here on you tube

  11. all liers! #TERRAMAR RUNS #COP27, GHISLAINE MAXWELLS PROJECT! SO WE ARE GOING TO LET A S@X TRAFFICKER LEAD US INTO A NEW WATER WORLD????????

  12. Blame Global Warming on Geoengineering Chem trail's more than anything

  13. They are against cheap energy & industrial capitalism because they lift up ordinary people and close the gap with the elites, who want distance & inequality.

    Naturally the elites need to claim the opposite, that they want an end to inequality and poverty, because everybody knows the quickest way to increase inequality and poverty is by making energy and food more expensive. 🙄

  14. ABC = Absolute bullshitting cockeads. Please do us all a massive favor and take your wealth thieving, climate lying nonsense and shove it in the one place you are safe from the sun.

  15. So the COP27 plan for decarbonisation is to give reparations to poorer countries for infrastructure projects which will in turn increase the earths carbon footprint. Hmmm 🤔

  16. How does using more resources help? Letting other countries develop just make it worse.

  17. Rewards for the lazy and useless… Punishment for those that work hard and are successful.

  18. If china is by far biggest payer then maybe.

  19. What? A rise in temperature means a change in temperature. It's not a flat conversion from 2.4 Celsius to 'about' 27 Fahrenheit (which would actually be 'about' 36 F, but whatever).
    For example, a rise from 20 C to 22.4 C (a change of 2.4 C) would be the equivalent of a rise from 68 F to 72.3 F, for a change of 4.3 F !!
    Did ABC come up with the number 27 from the name of the summit, COP-27, or the number of billions that the idiot-in-chief will spend on it this year?
    The UN lady must be laughing her a** off at the stupidity

  20. Where is e-check for vehicles? This is about control of our travel and passports. The elites will always fly first class

  21. China is building hundreds of coal fired power plants across Africa and Africa is going to want reparations for climate change.

  22. It was always about MONEY.

  23. Lets gonna Forbid butane , WOOD and PELLET stoves …. and NOT in 2030, but in 2023

  24. Let's send her to North Korea and tell him he owes them money

  25. “ When the environment is under stress that’s when infectious diseases JUMP FROM ANIMAL TO MAN “. Don’t you mean from Laboratory to man. 😆🤣😂

  26. When Civil rights groups asked for reparations for hundreds of years of slavery they were told to ( DO ONE ).
    I’m saying to these hypocritical big headed greedy crooks who are out on a crusade to also ( DO ONE ).

  27. Global warming is a fraud quit geo engineering and causing it not to rain. Proven fact.

  28. There's nothing green about mining minerals and making turbines in China!!!!

  29. I was shocked when I discovered both China and India are still labeled as “developing” countries by numerous agencies including the WTO and the World Bank. This is why I was questioning the transfer of wealth from the West to “developing” countries under this Climate scheme.

  30. Funny how all the people flying all over the place in private jets causing more carbon emissions than some countries

  31. If the people calling for reparations are feeling guilty about what they, and their corporations, have done to the environment, they can pay for it themselves. Taxpayers don't need to foot their bills any longer.

  32. The sky is falling the sky is falling says Chicken Little.#FJB.