Subscribe to ESPNcricinfo: http://bit.ly/1jnGh6S
Get our apps:
Android: http://bit.ly/2vFVfzX
iOS: http://apple.co/2vGj8rg
Website: http://www.espncricinfo.com/
You can also find us at:
https://www.facebook.com/Cricinfo
Tweets by ESPNcricinfo
https://www.instagram.com/espncricinfo/
source
If only Indians could find a 'legitimate' excuse for why all the other players choked and got out as well, we'd have a real controversy in our hands….:D…..Too bad for the wrong decision on the Gill issue….India would have SURELY won if it weren't for this BAD decision!….:D
Too often we see these not given with all the camera angles! I’m actually happy with the explanation of,” once the hands don’t turn and face the grass “ . Fingers under the ball should be given as a clean catch!
Even if there is 1% doubt on even 1 single frame then benefit of doubt should go to the batsman.
If you see it in one shot it appears the fingers were underneath
If that was a catch then icc should implement 1 pitch catch out Australian cheat b#@ches, oh wait i think steve Smith ball tampering with sand paper also legit,cheap basterds
Indian’s complaining that the umpires had the temerity to give an Indian out. What a surprise, not. Remember Gavaskar spitting the dummy at the MCG in 1981 and demanding Chetan Chauhan walk with him? That’s the standard to expect.
I'm Australian and it wasn't out…take that india 😂😂😂
Catches like these creates doubt – Green could have caugt it cleanly – replay shows the ball touching the grass
Than the decision should go towards the batsman
if he was jumping of a cliff with no ground, the ball would have stayed in his hands. the fingers are under the ball. it wouldn't have slipped through between his fingers. it
s not greens fault the ball came to him that low. it would've been caught but the ground got in the way
He caught it in the air fingers under the ball and its only natural to hit the ground after diving like that as long as you hold the ball and it does not dislodge which it didn't at any time. Indians carry on like it was a bump ball.
Not out
3rd all time sleeping
Yep, I reckon that was a catch far and square. The umpires thought so to, and that is all that matters
When you drop two catches in first innings and one being sitter. It's natural he will claim clean even if he did not. He acted as if he clean took a sitter whichh wasn't the case . Typical Aussies. But umpire is the idiot.
What's the point of technology if u r wrong…S.Manjerarkar is face of substantiating technology…poor Cricketer can also be a poor commentator and a poor critic…yt survives😂
Clearly ball touching the turf…. Its a not out bullshit umpiring amd the decisions will always goes against indians idk why
Very obviously a legitimate catch controlled well above the ground
lol so why not give run out based in real time ..
Are you guys experts ? Someone says something dumb and you repeat it. Sanjay I am disappointed that you are agreeing with this non sense.
Don't know what happened in review controversy
But if it's confirmed as a catch
Then it's a brilliant one
I don't know it was a clean take or not..if it was a clean catch..then show us the proof..
And if there was any doubt.. decision should have gone to the batsman's favour..
Hey Manjrekar I know you never support Indian cricket team, you are jealous, just go and get your eyes tested
Sanjay manjrekar likes to su#k foreigners di#k. Nothing new here. If ball touches the ground, its Not Out. If you are in full control of catch? Ball does not touch the ground. Its as simple as that.
"Fingers underneath the ball"
How are people not able to comprehend such a simple notion? I'm looking at you, Indian fans. When a finger is underneath a ball, and especially so when that finger is as massive as Green's, and the hand is touching the ground, there is literally no way for the ball to be touching the ground because the ground is coming into contact first with the finger….so unless you force the ground through his finger, which would be extremely painful, there is no way the ball could have contacted the ground. Go ahead and find yourself a ball and try it, wrap your fingers around it, even with them a little spread out, then place your hand on the ground, or even on your desk, and then see the gap that is between that hard surface and the ball. It's just simple logic but people thirst for controversy so will fool themselves into believing something that simply cannot be true.
The real talking point about this fourth day is WHY DID AUSTRALIA MAKE SUCH A BONEHEADED DECISION TO DECLARE? A drawn match means they are joint winners but winners nonetheless. Why even risk that to go for an outright win? It was such a dumb decision to make and India are proving that with every over that passes.
First time I saw it I thought it was out. 500 replays later………I still think it’s out.
Get this apologist off air, take your inferiority complex somewhere else buddy
Kya C hei ye.. Kud to kuch ukhad nahi paya apni time mei.. Ab paltu kutta ban raha hei..
In fact, in real time it looked out to me. I don't know what these guys are talking about. The ball is leaving Green's hands before he touched the ground. He has 2 fingers underneath, but there is a reasonable doubt that the ground helped him complete the catch. That's not out! If this is not a 'grassed' catch, I don't know which is. You instincts tells you that it was not out.. forget about the rule book.
4 aankho wala catch hi kahega. Neem ka patta karwa hai sanjay manjrekar ….. .. aage bhailog aap jodte jaaye
If you don't want to make a decision using all those cam angles and slow mos and stuff why do you have it then… Remove them all go back to onfield umpire era were his decision will be final for everything… Don't use any tech for decesion making…