Matchday LIVE: CWC23: Match 38 – Shakib, Shanto fifties hand Bangladesh important win



Farveez Maharoof and Steve Harmison join Arjun Pandit to look back at Bangladesh’s win against Sri Lanka

source

10 comments

  1. Either it will be within the rules or it will not be within the rules.Everyone should be respectful to the rules.
    What is spirit,it has nothing to do here.
    You showed lot of sprit few days back to @BLACKCAPS /Ish Sodi.
    If spirit is everything,what about captain Mathews against England ?
    This Sri-Lankan are out of the WC,that's why thay making some issue.
    One thik, I don’t understand,Shakib is the Spin bowler,why Angelo didn’t face him?
    He wasn’t Shoaib Akhtar !

  2. Ashwin mancud valid but Shakib time out invalid?

  3. Angelo Methews Before going into battle, everything must be prepared. When fighting, say to the opponent, stop, I am releasing the weapon. The opponent will give up on you. You have been playing cricket for so long and you don't know cricket rules. It is better not to speak than to speak nonsense. Play cricket from day to day and don't follow the rules of cricket then you are disrespecting the rules of cricket. Come out according to the rules and zing any boy. Teach yourself humility.

  4. It was an important match because both team are trying to qualify for Champions trophy 😂. Because only 7 team will qualify for CT😅

    Angelo Methews trying to hide his fault and he blaming shakib because he has to answer his national so the played a dirty trick he blamed shakib.

  5. "Why are some people blaming Shakib for everything? Before pointing fingers at him, let's consider the following points:

    1. Mathews is a professional and senior player; he should be aware of the ICC's 2-minute rule. His behavior suggested he might not have been familiar with this rule.

    2. Being an experienced player, Mathews should ensure the condition of his equipment. If his helmet was defective, he should have replaced it before going onto the pitch.

    3. Facing a spinner with a defective or no helmet is undoubtedly not a safety concern.

    4. Once on the pitch, if Mathews noticed his helmet was defective, he should have approached the umpire for permission before leaving to get a new one.

    5. This was not a simple match for Bangladesh. It was a do-or-die situation if they wanted to qualify for the Champions Trophy, and the same applied to Sri Lanka.

    6. When a team has lost six consecutive matches, the captain may do everything within the bounds of the law to turn things around. And sakib did so.

  6. to indian and pakistani hipocrates,get one thing in your head,,, sakib didnt give out,. he just appealed. umpires could have denied if it was wrong from sakib.
    And the helmet incident occured after the time out, so its a lame excuse from srilanka. The delay of mattheus could suffer sakib and b.desh for slow overrate. so its absolutely logical ground for sakib to appeal. u people do mankadding out, where the spirit goes then?

  7. Some people said when it’s happened in this match with Angelo it’ was very wrong to shakib

  8. If you guys have a problem with the rule that doesn’t have “spirit of the cricket”, you guys should’ve asked ICC to change the rules. Why blame a captain to follow the rule???

  9. FunFact: I think new guest talk a lot that cricinfo this video gets over 20m😂

  10. Shakib is absolutely fine. He is not out of rules. Sri Lanka are playing school cricket by slazing the cricketers