Supreme Court adopts code of conduct for first time | The Excerpt



USA TODAY Supreme Court Correspondent John Fritze breaks down the high court’s decision to adopt a code of conduct.

Gaza hospitals face dire conditions.

President Joe Biden’s issues with his party’s left flank are on display at the APEC summit.

USA TODAY Congress, Campaigns and Democracy Reporter Rachel Looker talks about proposed legislation around insulin deserts.

A missing hiker has been found dead, while his dog was found next to him alive.

#Podcast #IsraelHamasWar #News

source

23 comments

  1. Inside smoking ban area eugene oregon……alexis y fido

  2. Without enforcement the code of conduct is a joke.

    It isn't a matter of left or right, it is a matter of the court being something other than a politically driven farce. If we can't trust the courts our whole system of law and order falls apart.

    It is already falling apart. We all see how Trump is getting preferencial treatment that no other defendant would ever get.

    This gives a clear message to citizens: "It is not what the law says, it is what you can get away with." And frankly, that is a banana-republic message. It makes me ashamed to be an American that we've sunk this low.

  3. Wjen crooks make their own code of ethics, how useful is that? 🤣🤣

  4. You work for 40yrs to have $1m in your retirement, meanwhile some people are putting just $10k in a meme coin for just few months and now they are multimillionaires. I pray that anyone who reads this will be successful in life

  5. A phoney code of ethics with no enforcement mechanism is useless & pointless; a conservative smokescreen designed to delude the ignorants into having renewed faith in the corrupted SCOTUS!😒🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  6. Their code of ethics is a facade to save face. They simply want to deter further investigation. They have impunity from being corrupt. Publicly stating their "code of ethics", is just being sorry one of em got caught.

  7. How do I turn this crap off?

  8. This is exactly how Supreme Court should govern itself. As a separate but equal branch of US government, the justices also should nominate and confirm new members. Presently the judiciary is subservient to Executive and Legislative branches, bottom to top. That’s how we get justices who don’t know what is a woman and rely on media for pandemic info.

  9. Meaningless. Totally meaningless.

  10. Unethical people policing themselves. OMG. REALLY

  11. Totally laughable and obscene🤨

  12. Democrats broke all codes and constitutions

  13. ONLY IN AMERICA
    INVESTEGATE YOURSELF.
    YES BABY YES
    DON'T WORRY BE HAPPY AMERICANS

  14. God bless the Republicans
    God bless President TRUMP
    F the Democrats….FJB
    TRUMP 2024….TRUMP

  15. I expect the same results as when officers investigate themselves, nothing will come of this.

  16. This "code of conduct" is useless. It's full of "shoulds" and not "shalls." It is unenforceable. This is not a good faith effort.

  17. Too little too late! Thomas didnt recuse nothing done! 4 justices and or wives funny business covered up and ignored by chief justice . These people are the worst of us not the best of us. The federalist society is the enemy of the united states.

  18. I find it hard to believe that there wasn't severe restrictions already in place on bribes, I mean gifts, the SC can accept.
    Crooks, just like politicians.

  19. I mean other than conservative justices needing to be removed from the court entirely, what does this even have to do with politics? Pretty sure it's common sense regardless of politics that people in those types of positions shouldn't be taking bribes.

  20. Now hold the illegal leakers accountable for their illegal actions.