LIVE: Senate Judiciary Committee Meets to Vote on Ketanji Brown Jackson's Nomination | NBC News



Watch live coverage as the Senate Judiciary Committee meets to vote on the nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.

» Subscribe to NBC News: http://nbcnews.to/SubscribeToNBC
» Watch more NBC video: http://bit.ly/MoreNBCNews

NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.

Connect with NBC News Online!
NBC News App: https://apps.nbcnews.com/mobile
Breaking News Alerts: https://link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/breaking-news-signup?cid=sm_npd_nn_yt_bn-clip_190621
Visit NBCNews.Com: http://nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
Find NBC News on Facebook: http://nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
Follow NBC News on Twitter: http://nbcnews.to/FollowNBC
Follow NBC News on Instagram: http://nbcnews.to/InstaNBC

LIVE: Senate Judiciary Committee Meets to Vote on Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Nomination | NBC News

source

45 comments

  1. she should no way ever be a justice !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Oh mrs Blackburn clutching your cumdrop necklace

  3. Since your opinion has no legal standing can you tell me what a woman is?

  4. A vote for her is a vote for child abuse

  5. It's will be wise that black people are recgnised because they are capable of something. For any individual to electt any one base on the color of his skin or gender is pure racism. Old demented senile Joe biden made this appointment for this reason and looking back at Joe biden record its very telling that this old fool is pure racist….listen to him announcing kamala incapable Harris. Old Joe said he needs a wonder of color right… Pure racist. Now for a Supreme Court Judge old Joe does it again. Needs a woman of color. This is what is wrong with America. This is pure stupidity and such idiocy shouldn't be entertain. Wokeism will destroy America

  6. Ted “Cancun” Cruz, Josh Hawley, Lindsay Graham And Others Are Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's Political Enemies. They Will Try To Deprive Her Not To Attain To The Supreme Court Judge Position Without Success. They Won’t Prevail.

  7. remove Pelosi and the problems go with her!

  8. The only reason the Dems want her in the office is that she's black period!

  9. If the Republicans were smart about this they would agree to support her nomination if we accept Biology as the basis for determing Man vs Woman!

  10. It's a shame this is televised, really. Part of me appreciates the ability to see just how despicable some of these senators are, but I also can't help but wonder if there were no cameras for these buffoons to perform to, would they? It seems a lot of these senators are just using this platform to put on a show for their constituents, rather than actually vetting the nominee (in all these hearings).

  11. I would ask all those people who think the question of Man vs Woman be answered on a Biological Basis to raise their hands?

  12. I hope they checked her underside to make sure is of the appropriate color for the job.

  13. I’m the founder of a civic action non-profit and would like to make contact with you. Is that okay?

  14. If Senatorial candidates had undergone this type of scrutiny then the public would not have to suffer the idiocy that is Lindsey Graham.

  15. We have real problems today because the purpose of what we do has been separated form the actions we do, like voting, where we have totally disconnected the act of voting from why we are voting. There are only two purposes for voting, either as a legislative assembly or to form a legislative assembly, when we vote as a legislative assembly that is a democracy, when we vote to form a legislative assembly that is a Republican Form of government.

    Take this nomination to the Supreme Court, the purpose of this process, that we are calling a confirmation hearing, is totally disconnected from the purpose of a justice on the Supreme Court, or the purpose of the Court in general, which is important because that purpose of the court dictates how the court must be assembled, and makes this process totally inappropriate to that purpose.

    The Supreme Court is to sit as the last court of appeals to settle conflicts and disputes between the States and to give the States a process to seek redress for their grievances. That means that each State must participate in assembling the court because they have agreed to abide by the decisions of the court which adjudicates those conflicts and disputes. This cannot be a partisan process, nor can the court have an ideological balance determined by partisans, and there must be more than one nominee for the States to consider and choose from in order to assure that those chosen for the Court are chosen by a majority consensus of the States.

    The Supreme Court is not for determining any aspect of laws, because laws cannot be unconstitutional, to constitute means to form or assemble, and the only thing formed and assembled by the Constitution of the United States is Congress as a legislative assembly of the States governed by legislative processes to reach a majority consensus of the States as the Union, it’s how the States make the collective decisions of a free and independent State for matters of war, peace, alliances and commerce, which were extended from the individual States when they declared their independence from the State of Great Britain to the States as the Union by the Articles of Confederation. This made their assembly, the united States, in congress assembled, the Established Government Authority, and the Articles of Confederation is a participation versus compliance agreement between the States, but there still needed to be a conflict and dispute process to settle grievances, especially when the laws the States made collectively disenfranchised or otherwise disadvantaged one or more States even though they were made by a majority consensus of the States as the Union. This is why laws cannot be unconstitutional, only the assembly which made the laws or the process by which the laws were made can be unconstitutional.

    I know this is a hard concept for most to understand, but the Supreme Court is not for determining the constitutionality of laws, because as long as the laws are made in a properly assembled legislature which follows the established legislative processes to reach a majority consensus of the States as the Union, then the law itself cannot be unconstitutional, the Supreme Court then is only to settle conflicts and disputes between the States and for the States to seek redress of their grievances, nothing to do with the law.

    Here is an excerpt from Article 9 of the Articles of Confederation which established the court of appeals from which the Supreme Court was derived, its purpose, and how it was assembled, the only difference between this and the what is established in Articles 2 and 3 of the Constitution of the United States is that the President is responsible for providing the list of potential candidates for the States to consider, instead of each State providing a list of 3 persons, that alone should enlighten us why one nominee is not enough for the States as they are assembled in the Senate to consider, by and with their advice and consent.

    Article IX Clause 2 of the Articles of Confederation

    “The united states, in congress assembled, shall also be the last resort on appeal, in all disputes and differences now subsisting, or that hereafter may arise between two or more states concerning boundary, jurisdiction, or any other cause whatever; which authority shall always be exercised in the manner following. Whenever the legislative or executive authority, or lawful agent of any state in controversy with another, shall present a petition to congress, stating the matter in question, and praying for a hearing, notice thereof shall be given, by order of congress, to the legislative or executive authority of the other state in controversy, and a day assigned for the appearance of the parties by their lawful agents, who shall then be directed to appoint, by joint consent, commissioners or judges to constitute a court for hearing and determining the matter in question: but if they cannot agree, congress shall name three persons out of each of the united states, and from the list of such persons each party shall alternately strike out one, the petitioners beginning, until the number shall be reduced to thirteen; and from that number not less than seven, nor more than nine names, as congress shall direct, shall, in the presence of congress, be drawn out by lot, and the persons whose names shall be so drawn, or any five of them, shall be commissioners or judges, to hear and finally determine the controversy, so always as a major part of the judges, who shall hear the cause, shall agree in the determination.”

    Maybe we should actually start reading our founding documents instead of using them as coffee table coasters as we form our own inappropriate interpretations to suit our own agendas and quests for power. Notice too that this is the same process that they chose to select the President and Vice President, each State provides a list of potential candidates, the lists are combined, then the States choose from the top candidates identified on the list, 1 vote per State, and a majority of the States is necessary to the choice.

  16. Remember God loves you♥️.
    John 3:16
    For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life.
    If you trust in Jesus Christ and repent, you will be saved🙏.
    He is coming back soon🥳…

  17. she's a pedophile protector, vote NO

  18. Ted "Cancun" Cruz, Josh Hawley, Lindsey Graham NEED to be VOTED OUT.🙏

  19. My 4 year-old knows the difference between a man and a woman. (and she's not a biologist or ever been to law school.)

  20. Jackson is NOT the person for the SUPREME COURT! If you want to add to Biden and Teams corruption and screw ups, go ahead!!

  21. She'll be nominated in the name of Jesus

  22. I canot support the nominee, there for I will vote no to confirm judge jakson.

  23. Why are the dimocrats crying over the grilling of this Supreme Court Nominee? Didn't the dimocrats do the same? Didn't the dimocrats plant a "victim" in order to try and stop one of their nominees? stfu dims. Joe's a bumbling, mumbling pedo.

  24. I am very curious to those providing false facts that are misleading and damaging to her character, can they(those nasty Trump pleasing Republicans/wannabees the next president) be sued by her after she if confirmed?

  25. Good thing about these hearings being nationally televised it just shows the world just how racist this country is,

  26. I'm so proud of Joe Biden he has overcome so much over the years. First he said he didn't want his kids going to school in a Racial Jungle..then he gives a sweet speech at Robert Byrd eulogy a former KKK Member…Joe Biden says he lost a Mentor and good friend..Joe Biden blocked Janice Rogers brown from being Considered to picked to become The First black Supreme court justice. He said they would filibuster..he said it would be a Fight..But Joe Biden is a new man now…..

  27. Booker needs to switch jobs!!! He will be more suited in Hollywood!!!

  28. Nate Diaz to Lindsey Graham: “I ain’t surprised MF!”

  29. What self respecting morally upright individual would identify themselves as republican?

  30. What self respecting morally upright individual would identify themselves as republican?

  31. 🇺🇸JUDGE KETANJI is Eminently Qualified!🇺🇸
    to be on the Supreme Court
    (U.S. will NOT Accept Racism or Misogyny from Congressional efforts to Block Judge Ketanji from the Supreme Court) Meanwhile GQP Supreme Court Justice Thomas Needs to be Investigated for CRIMEs regarding Ginni Thomas participation in the J6COUP Conspiracy. Clarence Thomas knows that Ginni is involved in the effort to Overthrow the U.S. Gov.. Mr. Thomas Supreme Court Rulings reflect Clarence Thomas Obstruction of Justice, Crimes & Corruption.

  32. Lady Lindsey Graham is appalling, absolutely disgusting. Janice Rodgers Brown has nothing to do or is it her fault that Democrats did not want to pick her, How dare he do this or use this as some sort of gauge! He said Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson made it that way? Little bo peep has lost it!

  33. Is it true we could of had a first Black Supreme court justice years ago but Democrats wouldn't allow it..they said they would filibuster..Joe Biden also said he would filibuster her..but now Democrats act like it's their idea..people do ya'll Research…FBI weeks ago had posters put up say she was nominated..they had to take Posters down and said FBI officials should not take sides..didn't Apologize when got busted for this..

  34. To ask a Judge, who is a woman, vying to sit on the Supreme Court…" What is a woman" was a trap question .So they thought! She brilliantly answered…" I'm not a Biologist". The trap was to get her to define what a woman is in a legal setting. Knowing full well she could not answer that question, and tip her hand as to how she may or may not rule on a case that might come before the Court. Did not ask Barrett that question, nor any other potential Justice that question, male or female, that I can recall. Mentally, she was so far ahead of them. She was half way around the world when they were just getting their socks on…

  35. Shes only nominated cause shes a african american Woman

  36. SENATOR Cory Booker, you are a BLESSING to AMERICA. Wish we had people like you representing us!!
    I have been in MS. Jackson's shoes. And you just made me tear up. You are an Epitome of hope 🔦!! 🤗🤗🤗❤❤❤👌👌👌

  37. Sounds like they already made the decision.Why vote

  38. Funny how Ted Cruz thinks people are actually listening to anything he is saying.

  39. Senator Whitehouse was spot on.

  40. The Judiciary Committee will vote Ideologically
    Liberals will vote for the Rule of Law
    conservatives want their slaves back

  41. Vote against her! 🍌

  42. G. O. P. High. On. Nose 👃. Candy. That is why they can talk so fast and not say anything they are Seditionist. )). V. T. O. ✌🏼