Should no run be awarded if a batter is out on a free hit? Fleming, Moody and Billings agree to disagree on their opinions.
Subscribe to ESPNcricinfo: http://bit.ly/1jnGh6S
Get our apps:
Android: http://bit.ly/2vFVfzX
iOS: http://apple.co/2vGj8rg
Website: http://www.espncricinfo.com/
You can also find us at:
https://www.facebook.com/Cricinfo
Tweets by ESPNcricinfo
https://www.instagram.com/espncricinfo/
source
1. What's the point of having a free hit.
2. No please don't try and change test format.
3. I agree with fleming, don't complicate the game.
And as in smat they added a rule of impact player it's like playing with 12 players. It's ridiculous.
In football and other games substitute is understandable because they are very physical game. Cricket is also about preparation and tactics before the game. You have to play the best team according to condition, that's you're job as a captain.
You can try the substitute rule in franchise cricket but dont add it to international cricket.
The rule should be like this example
If say India play first and DK don't get to bat then you can replace DK with a bowler. It shouldn't be like a player batted also and then he is replaced with a bowler, that's like playing with 12 players
About first one then there will be no difference in wide and no-ball
Moody or moddy