TPUSA senior field representative Amber Kleinke and Washington Examiner columnist Ian Haworth discuss the attack on conservative speech and free speech as a whole on ‘The Bottom Line.’
Subscribe to Fox Business! https://bit.ly/2D9Cdse
Watch more Fox Business Video: https://video.foxbusiness.com
Watch Fox Business Network Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/
FOX Business Network (FBN) is a financial news channel delivering real-time information across all platforms that impact both Main Street and Wall Street. Headquartered in New York — the business capital of the world — FBN launched in October 2007 and is one of the leading business networks on television, having topped CNBC in Business Day viewers for the second consecutive year in 2018. The network is available in nearly 80 million homes in all markets across the United States. Owned by FOX Corporation, FBN is a unit of FOX News Media and has bureaus in Chicago, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C.
Follow Fox Business on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxBusiness
Follow Fox Business on Twitter: https://twitter.com/foxbusiness
Follow Fox Business on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxbusiness
source
"It's just easier to placate the ones who are having a temper tantrum than to deal with them. It's easier to avoid the hassle of confrontation than to deal with these people like adults who need to be held responsible and accountable for their actions."
The parents of these radicals said exactly the same thing as they surrendered to the screaming of their child and gave them the candy they demanded. The parents didn't want to discipline their children and now we have these unruly students who demand participation ribbons, top wages for doing nothing, and insist that everyone agree with them or they will scream and yell over the opposition.
Those tactics are only effective on the weak willed and lily livered…Strong Folks won't allow this kind of behavior from their students or their children. When parents become parents again, this kind of activity will cease because strong, righteous parents demand respect from their offspring and won't allow them to rule the roost.
Children should NEVER be in charge of a household…Those who are responsible should hold the children responsible for their own actions.
MUSK PROVES HE IS A HYPOCRITE OPENING MEGA FACTORY IN COMMUNIST CHINA PUTTING GREED OVER FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HUMAN RIGHTS!!!
Republicans are FASCIST THAT DON'T VALUE FREEDOM OF SPEECH
I experience turn over in my like when I meet Maskoffaid on they changed the situation from living to panic to been financially stable
I experience turn over in my like when I meet Maskoffaid on they changed the situation from living to panic to been financially stable
Where's Security, have a plan before you go in there.
And this is why they want to disarm American Patriots… Communist have been infiltrating our education system since the 1950's
This has nothing to do with science. This is all about the X and Y chromosome deniers……..
Political Systems are essentially an invalid, logically defective, flawed man made construct or concept because Economic Systems are the meaningful (substantive) determinant which makes all the difference. For instance Capitalism enables citizens to own property, and utilize capital to produce profits.
Humans had the ability to self sustain human life (at the individual + species level) for millions of years prior to the invention of government.
The only logical necessity, humans need to survive is property rights. The right to absolutely..
1) 100 percent ownership of our lives immediately upon birth.
2) 100 pct ownership of all property we create ourselves, and or properly acquire from others in a mutually agreeable exchange, and or inherit, and or are freely given by others who properly acquired it.
the logical basis for property rights is
1) without the ability to own the food (we had the foresight to grow or trade for) humans are unable to self sustain human life .. without depending on the mercy of others, (typically) the evil humans who might take our lives and our property (if property rights didn't exist).
the creation of governments, even our American Democracy,
1) is improper because for instance the concept of Democracy is flawed because despite the number of humans who create a majority (need, want or desire) it's imperative that majority opinion never have the (Authority or Permission) to prevail if their opinions violate the Rule of Logic.
2) Democracy at it's best is simply duplicating Rule of Logic and at it it's worst is (improperly) thwarting Rule of Logic.
3) if a (99 out of 100) majority opposes (1 opinion out of 100) this can't change the fact it's improper to consider anything other than the (appropriate) Logic, (which although redundant, must never violate property rights). Unless i myself error'd (formulating property rights) because i will switch to superior logic (instantly as soon as i understand it) because i always win when logic itself wins. Logically, every logical human wins every time any human comes nearer to properly interpreting the logic of any logically flawed thesis.
Logic is factually similar to math + science. When logic is properly formulated or templated for the first time it's essentially already optimal or near reaching optimal attributes + properties which are typically able to stand until improved upon but eventually plateaus as nearly maintenance free.
I've formulated logic similar to (my best attempts to interpret the logic) (Ayn Rand created). My version adds the fact that prior to the creation of governments humans weren't dependent upon governments thus the creation of governments added a dependency which didn't exist prior to the invention of governments. The words dependency + independent are opposites. One example of our democratic governments failure of Democracy is where the invention of our Social Security Administration error'd by inventing social security + medicare taxes because they (those taxes)
1) violate property rights, and property rights exist as a logical necessity, not an (assumption or first premise). The only premise if any which property rights are based upon is an absurdity i wouldn't mention except to provide the only (assumption or premise) not already defined in the paragraph describing how property rights must exist or humans won't be able to sustain human life without depending upon the mercy of others. The necessity for property rights to exist (to be able to sustain human life) stems from the near absurd but necessary (first assumption or premise) which is that from the point of view of a human (the fact human life exists, is a good rather than bad thing) [for us humans].
2) the fact social security spends more money than it receives (it, social security) nearly matches the definition of bankrupt. It overspends on overhead costs caused by mismanagement. And our government's plans for future generations to keep funding social security near perfectly matches the definition of a ponzi scheme.
the solution for (near all) problems democracy has created is to prosecute our Legislators for their Lawlessness where i define ( their specifically unique) lawlessness as Legislators failure to create Laws (constraining + thus omg limiting) government (Authority + thus the Permissions) it can grant itself to only the (few uniquely anomalous) logically bonafide [ DUTY's ] which for whatever anomalous reasons it's necessary for government to claim it [our government] logically must be able to deny consumers of consumer (products+services) the improved results of individual capitalist, competitive, competitors competing to become 1 of the top 99 (competently competitive) providers within their consumer (product+service) niche. In summary our democracy failed to restrict government's (Authority+Permission) to only the few (if any even exist) bonafide Logical DUTY's.
Logically, our Legislators can't grant our government (Authority+Permission) unless anomalous (DUTY) exists + this is because it would deny consumers the benefits of the improved results competitive competition guarantees.
Additionally, when government error'd by replacing [independent] self sustainability of human life by adding [dependency] upon government, the single example, our governments near bankrupt social security ponzi scheme provides evidence the [certainty] humans could self sustain life was replaced by the [uncertainty] the [dependency] upon government added and again tho it's redundant, generally speaking near everything if not everything government does replaced [independence with dependence] + [certainty with uncertainty].
In summary, i want to reiterate where government doesn't have an anomalous DUTY
1) it's inappropriate for government to deny consumers of consumer (products+services) the benefit of the improved results of competitive competition.
an additional example of our governments failure is the Licensing of Medical Doctors which artificially inflated the cost of medical care.
1) the medical care industry should be completely deregulated.
2) our government doesn't have a DUTY to even notice the medical care industry exists.
3) deregulation will result in advisory services (for instance on the internet) providing competitive advise on who is good at what + these services, as is (near) everything within pure capitalism .. near always adept at self adapting to competitive conditions, which means there's such a high probability of success that near everything will improve so rapidly all of us should be able to experience what logic proves is our birthright ( the right to absolute 100 pct ownership of our own lives + our own destiny's) (including) eternal healthy human life, here on earth for eternity (happening within our lifetimes).
voluntary instead of mandatory education will encourage humans to desire competent, timely advice.
1) an example of a forced education's waste of resources is the one quarter of a century (25years) humans are currently delayed from becoming Medical Doctors. The artificial (shortage of supply) of Medical Doctors is a direct result of government's Licensing + Regulation.
2) imagine, everyone born (for the next 25 years) being denied the ability to be a Medical Doctor. Meaning nobody born in the next 25 years becomes a MD (until, the 26th year from today). This seems to deny logic to the point of being a variant of a ponzi scheme or multi-level fraud upon logic itself.
"If you do what you always did, you will get what you always got." _
Such hypocrisy from the FASCIST LEFT! THEY'RE INSANE!
Dagen M. is NOT good at her job. She's too forceful and kind of an airhead. Sorry Fox, but lose this one.
Have leftists ever supported free speech. Free speech to them, only means their speech. They are quite eager to actively suppress any other speech. Just like the Soviet Union. Just like East Germany.
In other words, they are hypocritical liars.
Heterophobic delusional fascist
The terroristic trans movement
Let's dwell on the right application of Free Speech.
Yet here y’all are speaking freely…
Doesn't the government hold the ability to revoke licenses to colleges
So what do they do with the debating team did they just toss that class out
Yeah there's silence on YouTube to they just took down one of my post because it was against album Bragg and the bidens
YES, THEY ARE SPOILED BRATS, and Democrats are supporting them. Dems need to live with their freaks they support, and get their votes. I am ready to split the country between Red and Blue.
Speakers need to be protected, big time.
California stinks so bad.
Just one more reason not to give them relief for their college loans.
SEND THESE PEOPLE ATTACKING FREE SPEACH TO CHINA FOR (10 YEARS) WITH ITS SOCIAL CREDIT SCORE.
THEY WILL BE BEGGING TO COME BACK TO THE U.S.A.